Translation of "Green policies" in German

The EU is a pioneer of green policies and technologies.

That's basically green policies, made by Merkel.

Green economy policies have already been implemented in developed and developing countries.

For further details of all our green policies just click here.

The chapter "Why are Green Fiscal Policies such a Small Part of Green Economic Policies?

Other ASEAN countries such as Thailand and Indonesia also adopt green auto policies.

Some of us, however, have said that they do not expect very much in the way of green policies from the new Commission, and our whole group will, in future, also see to it that the Commission gives sufficient weight to the principles of the creation of a social Europe and sustainable development, so that they have a serious part to play in all decision-making.

The reality which we have all realised is that the 2020 strategy does not even have enough green or social policies.

Effective measures are also required to increase the employment rate and social gains for women as part of the Europe 2020 strategy, as well as programmes for encouraging the involvement of women in the green economy, policies promoting greater representation for women in the managerial decision-making process, and lastly, suitable legislative amendments to get more women into management positions.

As a result of "green" energy policies imposed by Brussels - code for subsidising French and German energy firms at the consumer's expense - European industry pays twice as much for electricity, and four times as much for gas, as in the United States.

They burn the carbon set free by the “green” countries (leakage effect) and they also burn the additional carbon extracted as a reaction to the announced and expected price cuts resulting from the gradual greening of environmental policies (green paradox).

We are focusing on insignificant – but very costly – green policies that make us feel good, while ignoring or actively discouraging policies that would dramatically reduce emissions and make economic sense.

Unfortunately, the green-energy policies currently being pursued are not helping the environment or the economy.

Gülen concluded that job creation “cannot be defended as another benefit” of well-meaning green policies.

Voilà: simply by investing in green policies, we have not only helped the climate, but also lowered unemployment.

Thus, green policies will paradoxically accelerate rather than mitigate global warming.

But each job created by green-energy policies costs an average of $175,000 – considerably more than job creation elsewhere in the economy, such as infrastructure or health care.

But the self-interest of energy companies, biofuel producers, insurance firms, lobbyists, and others in supporting “green” policies is a point that is often missed.

The EESC is concerned to note that green tax incentive policies have suffered a serious setback in recent years as a result of "fiscal austerity", which is causing a severe contraction of economic activity and the job market.

Therefore, the Round Table insists that in accordance with the Rio+20 Outcome Document national green economy policies should be consistent with international law, take into account the needs of developing countries and strengthen international cooperation.

The Round Table insists that in accordance with the Rio+20 Outcome Document national green economy policies should be consistent with international law, take into account the needs of developing countries and strengthen international cooperation.

The Round Table stresses that, in accordance with the Rio+20 Outcome Document, national green economy policies should be consistent with international law, take into account the needs of developing countries and strengthen international cooperation.

The Committee could serve as the official "communicator" of new green policies to the organised European civil society towards achieving the development of a "green culture".