Übersetzung für "Groundwater body" in Deutsch

In principle no groundwater body will be allowed to exceed these standard values.

According to the latest report by the European Environmental Agency, every groundwater body in the EU exceeds the threshold values for nitrates, and these make up 87% of the groundwater in agricultural areas.

Common rules are established for the identification and reversal of pollution trends, as well as for measures for indirect discharges into groundwater which put at risk the achievement of good chemical status of the groundwater body concerned.

For consistency, the added text should be complemented by “river basin or groundwater body level” and moved to Annex II, Part C, as suggested above.

It also requires that all significant and sustained upward trends in pollution of a groundwater body should be reversed.

Amendment 30 is linked to the change of the definition suggested by Amendment 17, which is acceptable in principle on the basis that the definition makes it clear that the standards may be established at European or national level or at the level of river basin or groundwater body.

Specific trend assessment shall be carried out for relevant pollutants in bodies of groundwater that are affected by point sources of pollution, including historical point sources, in order to verify that plumes from contaminated sites do not expand over a defined area and deteriorate the chemical status of the groundwater body.

The transposition of Annex V, which concerns monitoring of the status of surface and ground waters is also lacking certain aspects, including the requirements to monitor the discharge of extra water into groundwater bodies, and to provide maps with the characteristics specified in the Directive to describe the chemical levels and amounts of water per groundwater body.

Amendment 91 stipulates that when the natural levels of pollutants found in a groundwater body or a group of groundwater bodies are above the quality standards defined in Annexes I or II (i.e. standards established at national level) the background levels should be taken into account to establish the limit between poor and good groundwater chemical status.

This means that situations might occur where standard values having been exceeded will correspond to local pressures needed to be controlled and possibly remedied without classifying the groundwater body with “poor status”.

Other situations will show that one or more cases of standard value overruns may represent a serious threat to a groundwater body and thus lead it to reach “poor status” classification.

Substantial time lags can occur before changes in agricultural practices are reflected in groundwater quality, depending on the soil type and the specific hydrogeological conditions of the groundwater body and overlying substrate.

By mixing models (e.g., Piston Flow, Binary Mixing, or Dispersion Model) assuming specific recharge periods, flow paths, and mixture constants, the average residence time of the various age components of a groundwater body can be more accurately calculated.

As part of regional groundwater balancing, we perform hydraulic measurements and tests in the groundwater body.

Nevertheless, groundwater is the body of water where most of our planet's freshwater is stored, as well as a similar amount of saltwater.

Suitable measures must be taken to improve a groundwater body with a bad status, with the aim of achieving a good status by 2015.

The scientist wants to demonstrate that cucurbiturils do not only mobilize steroids, but can also immobilize them again e.g. when they enter the groundwater with body excretions.

Nevertheless, groundwater is the body of water where most of our planet’s freshwater is stored, as well as a similar amount of saltwater.

The characterisation of groundwater bodies is to be carried out by Member States under Article 5 of the WFD.

I support all mandatory measures and instruments for Member State cooperation on shared groundwater bodies.

Article 6 introduces an additional provision to ensure that groundwater bodies are adequately protected.

Water resources are polluted by wastewater and endanger health, the environment, groundwater and water bodies.

It proposes a new category of groundwater bodies mandated with the certification of safety zones with the chemical status of ‘very good’, and calls for an array of new examination, reporting and supervision requirements, the additional costs of which would be borne by the Member States and by municipalities.

On the European continent, at any rate, groundwater bodies, like rivers, know no borders.

I welcome the measures established in the directive, which lays down mandatory criteria for assessing the chemical status of groundwater and for identifying trends in the pollution of groundwater bodies, while also introducing measures for protecting groundwater from indirect pollution.

Therefore, it is important to protect this treasure from pollution, and this is only possible within the framework of cooperation between countries, because groundwater bodies do not take into account country borders.

The discussion of the proposed WFD has clearly demonstrated that there is a need for a more systematic and standardised assessment of groundwater bodies across Europe.

The new recital introduced by Amendment 3 is not acceptable because not all groundwater bodies are used for the production of drinking water and to require all groundwater bodies to respect quality standards which assume that they will be used for drinking water is unrealistic.

It was not considered appropriate to list new quality standards that would be applied uniformly to all groundwater bodies throughout Europe, because of the natural variability of groundwater chemical composition and the present lack of monitoring data and knowledge.

This has now been changed by consolidating criteria for assessing groundwater chemical status in Article 3, namely ‘groundwater quality standards’ and ‘threshold values’, and including requirements on the establishment of the latter with additional provisions on trans-boundary groundwater bodies.

Equally, groundwater bodies flowing through bordering nations can be polluted by contaminated sites on one side of the border.

Similarly, specific trend assessment shall be performed in those areas of groundwater bodies in which significant and sustained upward trends of concentrations of any pollutants identified pursuant to Article 4 of this Directive might result in adverse effects on associated aquatic ecosystems or dependent terrestrial ecosystems, or interference with existing or future uses of groundwater.

Groundwater in bodies of water used for the abstraction of drinking water or intended for such future use must be protected in such a way that deterioration in the quality of such bodies of water is avoided in order to reduce the level of purification treatment required in the production of drinking water, in accordance with Article 7(2) and (3) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.

Water quality data submitted show that for groundwater in England 83 % of groundwater bodies have mean nitrate concentrations below 50 mg/l nitrate and 58 % concentrations below 25 mg/l nitrate.