Übersetzung für "Infringement decision" in Deutsch

The mere fact that an undertaking has already been the subject of an infringement Decision and that, in spite of this finding and of the fine imposed, it has continued to engage in another analogous infringement in breach of the same provision of the Treaty is sufficient to constitute recidivism.

For the purpose of recovery of an administrative penalty and/or fine or notification of a decision imposing such a penalty and/or fine, the requested authority shall act in accordance with the national laws, regulations and administrative practices in force in the requested Member State applying to the same or, in the absence of the same, a similar infringement or decision.

The Commission finds that Italy has unlawfully implemented the deferral of payment in question, rendering unlawful also the aid to which it relates (see paragraph 13, second indent, above) and the new aid scheme determined by the infringement of Decision 2003/530/EC (see paragraph 13, third indent).

Victims will have at least one year to claim damages once an infringement decision by a competition authority has become final.

Victims will have at least 1 year to claim damages once an infringement decision by a competition authority has become final.

In conformity with the case-law of the Court of Justice, however2, the power of the Commission to adopt an infringement decision in such circumstances is limited to cases where it has a legitimate interest in doing so.

Even when the Commission has found it necessary to determine the precise effects of the infringement in its decision, it still falls to the national court to determine individually the loss caused to each of the persons to have brought an action for damages.

Any suspected, reported or established infringement of this Decision shall be investigated by the Security Department at the request of the Director-General for

Any suspected, reported or established infringement of this Decision shall be investigated by the Security Department at the request of the Director-General concerned or of the Director-General for Personnel and Administration.

Although the leniency notice (Æ point 206) does not apply to thiskind of infringement, the decision stresses the importance that the Commissionattaches to cooperation by companies which have infringed the Communitycompetition rules, in that it takes account both of Nintendo’s decision to offersignificant financial compensation to third parties which suffered material harmand of the general cooperation afforded by the companies during the administrative procedure.

Accordingly, the applicant's plea alleging infringement of Decision 94/90 and the Code of Conduct must be dismissed as unfounded.

Having been requested by the Commission to cease the ongoing infringement of the Decision of 23 December 1992,Scholler refused to undertake to discontinue this practice.

Consequently, even though the Commission did not expressly use the concept of a 'single infringement' in the Decision, it implicitly

In evaluating the seriousness of the infringement, the draft decision took account of the facts describedabove and assessed them according to the principle that an agreement or a concerted practice such as aprice-fixing or market-allocating cartel constitutes a very serious infringement of Community law.

Notwithstanding the very serious nature of the infringement, the draft decision has regard to the specificfeatures of this case, concerning as it does a national market subject at the time of the infringement to thespecial rules of the ECSC Treaty, and in which the addressees of the decision accounted, during the initialphase of the infringement, for a limited share of the relevant market.

Google, Mr Raboin and Tiger were found guilty of trade mark infringement, a decision which was upheld on appeal.

For an infringement of the right to be heard to be established, there had to be a causal link between the procedural defect alleged to constitute that infringement and the decision taken in that the defect was decisive in reaching the decision.

This was in keeping with the Enlarged Board's settled case law on infringement of the right to be heard, according to which one condition was that there be a causal link between the procedural defect constituting the infringement and the decision in that the defect was decisive factor in reaching that decision (settled case law following R1/08), i.e. it could not be ruled out that a different decision would have been reached if the party had been heard on the point with respect to which it alleged that its right to be heard had been infringed.

In the course of the deeper analysis of the case that took place during the investigation procedure, the Commission discovered an additional infringement of decision C 10/94: in the whole period during which the employees — as holder of a 49 % stake in HSY — were participating in the management of HSY, they have never paid the purchase price they were supposed to pay under the partial privatisation contract of September 1995.

The actions are part of a series of environment-related infringement decisions against several Member States which the Commission is currently announcing.

These actions are part of a series of environment-related infringement decisions against several Member States which the Commission is now announcing over a period of days.

These actions are part of a series of environment-related infringement decisions against several Member States which the Commission is currently announcing.

These actions are part of a series of environment-related infringement decisions against several Member States, which the Commission is currently announcing.

For more details on all decisions please consult the infringement decisions register.

The proposal facilitates follow-on damages claims by stipulating that final infringement decisions by national competition authorities have probative effect.

I stated that information gathering and public hearing concern the entire public at large, but I limited the legal safeguards following the decision to a more restricted public, in other words those whose rights are infringed by the decision.

In my proposal, the right of appeal is restricted solely to those whose rights are infringed by a decision, so that appeal is not used with deliberately vexatious intent.

In these conditions, it may be maintained that this law infringes the decision of the Council of European Ministers of 25 June 2002 according to which, when – as is the case in France – a European ballot taking place in a single national constituency is regionalised, the reform must take place ‘without affecting the essentially proportional nature of the voting system’.