Übersetzung für "Enforcement level" in Deutsch

Effective enforcement ensures a level playing field for competition.

First, the difficulties in the application linked to the lack of both uniform interpretation and consistent enforcement at national level are still high.

Secondly, on the enforcement, what level of flexibility is there because of the current crisis afflicting all Member States to allow for leverage or margins for error within that 3% figure?

While such a committee is undoubtedly necessary, since there has been virtually no forum until now where such persons can meet, it does not really achieve the objective of real cooperation in the field of law enforcement at operational level.

However, the fight against pollution discharges requires not only effective measures at EU level and greater cooperation between Member States, but also more effective enforcement at world level.

We abstained on the vote today because the PSE has hijacked a very positive report by inserting a call for an entirely untested and potentially very costly legal provision for European level enforcement of collective rights.

The 2010 Report concluded that problems with enforcement at EU level are due to the fact that, in many Member States, enforcement is not effective, proportionate and dissuasive enough to provide carriers with an economic incentive to comply with the Regulation.

Article 16 of the Regulation envisages enforcement at national level without establishing any tool to ensure the necessary harmonised, consistent and efficient application of the regulation at EU level.

This implementation is not progressing well enough: transposition has been slow and enforcement at national level uneven.

However, there are significant shortcomings in the implementation of the current legislation that hinder the full exploitation of best available techniques originally intended by the Directive, that make enforcement at Community level very difficult and that are not conducive to the prevention or reduction of unnecessary administrative burden.

The Committee understands from the Draft Regulation that the eco-audit system, as contained in the Commission proposal, is separate from official environmental protection enforcement at Community level and particularly Member State level.

While there is a co-ordination role at EU level, enforcement remains principally a national, regional or local competence.

The Commission will analyse national penalty schemes to see whether the three applicable criteria for sanction schemes (to be effective, proportionate and dissuasive) are sufficient to avoid discrepancies in enforcement at national level or whether further harmonisation is needed to provide carriers with an economic incentive to comply with passenger rights legislation and to ensure a proper level playing field, as requested by stakeholders.

Working with Member States to detect and overcome obstacles in national law hampering proper application of the Regulation –including, if necessary, the opening of infringement procedures- will improve enforcement at EU level.

This process should contribute to the goal of setting up and implementing a methodology for intelligence-led law enforcement at EU level.

First, a tougher stance against evasion, and stronger enforcement at national level, are essential.

First, a tougher stance against evasion and stronger enforcement at national level are essential.

Even if these warnings and NEB joint actions have improved enforcement at EU level, shortcomings which require further actions remain:

Notably the trade unions favoured a better legal framework and enforcement at European level, in order to combat cross-border social fraud.

Experts highlighted a number of problems for enforcement at EU level such as lack of resources, insufficient cooperation between agencies, in some Member States non-deterrent sanction levels and the lack of reliable data to analyse the scope of the problem.

The document assesses the application and implementation of instruments dealing with law enforcement at national level and international cooperation.

The efficiency of the sanction system must be considered, as well as the extent to which and the reasons why existing sanctions do not achieve the desired enforcement level.

The complexity of a large Union also increases the importance of enforcement at national level, in particular ensuring that service providers have effective, fast and affordable means of redress at national level to enforce their Single Market rights.

A framework was also established to measure the effectiveness of enforcement at national level.

The causes of insufficient progress are market failures (such as insufficient price signals, split incentives, asymmetric information, missing or incomplete markets and high initial costs) and regulatory failures (such as lack of comprehensive policy frameworks, poor enforcement and low level of ambition).