Übersetzung für "Ausgaben kürzen" in Englisch

They will need to reduce their expenditures.

Governments that trim public expenditures in a hurry rarely make informed choices.

If they'd put some of that effort into cutting expenditure...

Faced with declining revenues, the local governments were forced to reduce their expenditures accordingly.

The recipient governments will have to cut their spending; the banks will have to take large losses.

I am in favour of cutting costs in relation to the Commission and its agencies.

The only recourse is to slash wages and public spending - spurred on by Berlin.

To try to cut spending in a slump, as Osborne is doing, is to prolong the slump.

But with presidential elections looming, no US government would cut spending or raise taxes.

Occasionally, we have to make some cuts.

Reduce the budget, lower taxes.

We must cut down our expenses.

With all 27 Member States drastically cutting their spending, no European budget, which accounts for just 1% of European GDP, will make up for it.

Greece will have to cut expenditure, but when it comes to the stronger countries, their luck will be in, and suddenly we will find that they will be allowed to break these rules on political grounds.

In my view, our priorities should be policies which promote jobs and growth across the EU, especially at a time when Member States are cutting back on their spending.

There are several areas of the budget where we all know we could be cutting expenditure.

It needs to make a positive contribution to economic recovery, but also cut, reduce and contain spending where possible.

We are well aware that, if we abide by the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact - which, incidentally, is vital - but do so only by cutting expenditure, then we are on course for social regression and economic recession.

It would provide an estimated EUR 200 billion of income a year, thus allowing the Union to properly finance its budget, at a time when Council Members are already making known their intention to cut it, despite the added value that results from European expenditure.

My last comment relates to the fact that members of the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament have said that we should implement the 2020 strategy, and not merely cut spending.

We are all aware of her desire to streamline these expenditures but it is right to point out once again that these are some of the most effective, most visible and most direct forms of European aid to our regions and localities.

They keep asking for more and more, while Parliament and the Commission should just be marking time or even cutting their spending.

I would just briefly disagree with Mr Samland when this morning he criticized the Council for being at the end of the line of ministers. Of course all too frequently they are at the end of a line of civil servants with politicians taking their diktats from national civil servants who have no political background, are not responsive to democratic impulses but are largely officials serving finance ministers' diktats to cut spending, to increase refunds to Member States and to bow the knee to Maastricht convergence criteria.

So we find ourselves, as in 1997, in sympathy with Member States who are having to cut back on expenditure to meet the Maastricht criteria for the single currency.

Mr President, at a time when Member States are reducing public spending, in the UK our government is seeking to overhaul the benefits system to make work pay more.

If we believe that we can resolve the problem by simply cutting back on public spending, then we are not facing up to reality.