Übersetzung für "Abbau von bürokratie" in Englisch

The first factor identified was reducing red tape.

Simplification and reduction of red tape are important objectives.

Our aim should be exactly the opposite: decreasing bureaucracy.

With reduced bureaucracy, universities would be allowed more personal initiative.

Measuring bureaucracy is one thing, however; eliminating it is another.

In so doing we will also help to reduce bureaucracy and secure jobs.

Therefore, I understand very well this need to reduce bureaucracy and excessive complications.

Many measures which help to reduce red-tape are in the hands of the Member States.

Speeding up project implementation on the ground by reducing red tape also helps national and regional economies to recover.

The reduction in bureaucracy and unnecessary administrative procedures would accelerate the realization of various projects.

I believe that European firms and citizens greatly need a reduction in the red tape imposed by the Community acquis and certain national legislations.

We will increase the efficiency of the ports through increased use of new technology and by reducing bureaucracy.

Cutting down on red tape and thereby streamlining tendering procedures would allow researchers to focus on their own professional goals, through the use of resources and skills that would otherwise be wasted.

Simplifying the administration and reducing the amount of bureaucracy are important requirements, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises, because they want to do business on world markets and to do this they need our support.

Public funding must be increased for research and development in order to mobilise private investment, while simplifying procedures and cutting red tape are a prerequisite for industry's increased involvement.

As such, I welcome the conclusions of the Commission's review, and I am very pleased to see the new proposals aiming to improve access to finance and markets, and to move forward with the process of cutting red tape.

We also think that research and innovation in the European Union can only be developed by cutting red tape, simplifying and converging procedures, developing applied research and making it easier for small and medium-sized enterprises to access funding.

We must make every effort to improve efficiency and transparency and we must link this with an abandonment of unnecessary bureaucracy.

Let us prove to the Member States that responsibility for tourism at European level does not mean an increase in bureaucracy, but will on the contrary help bring about deregulation and a reduction in bureaucracy.

In this context, I also welcome Mrs Weiler's supplementary proposals because she believes, quite positively, that bureaucracy should be eliminated, social rights must not fall by the wayside, citizens should be informed, mutual recognition of training is necessary, and a social insurance card should be introduced, perhaps to prevent, too, the abuse of a directive on posted workers.

This proposal is one of our contributions to the removal of bureaucracy and of the other barriers that mean that a financial internal market is still not yet feasible.

Bureaucracy needs to be reduced, barriers dismantled and infrastructure, ports and airports increasingly expanded.

We have proven that the proposal can be amended in a way that the objective of cutting out the red-tape and irresponsible obstacles to the free movement is achievable without affecting social protection.

I am pleased to note your willingness to review this matter and look forward to really new proposals, for the ‘justification’ for this package as having to do with the reduction of bureaucracy and of excessive impositions is certainly not applicable here.

I voted in favour of the Hegyi report (A6-0233/2006) on the thematic strategy on the urban environment, because it is vital to boost the overall environmental performance of cities in Europe by reducing bureaucracy, by enhancing the efficiency of environmental policy implementation, and by encouraging long-term environmental planning.

Why did he not mention that we are introducing new bureaucratic procedures in Europe, and thus doing the exact opposite of what we proclaim in our soapbox speeches about cutting red tape and achieving the Lisbon objectives?

Measures such as 'one stop administrative shopping' and cutting red tape reduce costs and pave the way for a sounder and more competitive economy in the sector.

Firstly, concerning red tape and better regulation: I would like him to report annually on the achievements of reducing red tape in order to show that he will reach the goal by 2012 of 25% less red tape than exists today.