Übersetzung für "Ockhams rasiermesser" in Englisch

Look, man, you ever hear of Occam's razor?

Who can tell me about occam's razor? Yeah?

Now, is occam's razor a rule Or more of a guideline?

And I must say, I am a sucker for Occam's razor.

Occam's razor would suggest he's guilty.

You ever heard of Occam's Razor?

William of Ockham This is Ockham's famed Razor.

Ever heard of Occam's razor?

Ockham's razor... all things being equal,?

You ever here of occam's razor?

Occam's razor suggests that the simpler theory with fewer assertions (e.g., a universe with no supernatural beings) should be the starting point in the discussion rather than the more complex theory.

Yesterday I posted this image of what climatologists are claiming is evidence of warming in the last decade, and explained how it actually shows a cooling trend; however, it has come to my attention that the methodology I used, while completely legitimate in a completely fallacious sense, did violate the scientific principle of Occam's Razor, which states that the simplest explanation is the most likely.

An attractive argument to substantiate this claim includes the use of the rational principle called Occam's razor.

In the result, this "Occam razor" forced the science to-date to atach to everything that scientists do, the unwritten claim that "God does NOT exist", which actually is contradictive to the merit of "free will" and to the existing evidence.

On the other hand, the "Occam razor" forbids to people leading research that run along one amongst two existing and perfectly recognised approaches, i.e. it forbids to research the reality from the "a priori" approach ("from God to reality around us") - allowing to research the reality only from "a posteriori" approach (i.e. "from effects to causes").

Thus, that setting the philosophical foundation of the human science on the "Occam razor", transformed the science into an exclusively "atheistic institution".

Also I had mentioned, when comparing “mental powers” and magic tricks in my post “Magic?” about the report of a mentalist show attendant: “So why use ominous, mysterious, speculative paranormal as a fictuous attempt to explain things if the ordinary tricks are so beautifully sufficient explanations?” (Keyword „Occam’s razor“)

Lyme disease doctors may have fallen prey to the invisible dragon fallacy and fail to apply Occam’s Razor, the principle that the simplest explanation is usually the most accurate.

If one analyses thoroughly the matter of scientific and philosophical foundations of the science, then it turns out, that the only foundations on which rests the entire huge structure of the to-date "atheistic orthodox science", is that "founding assumption" called the "Occam razor" (i.e.

But that faces the eminent disadvantage that now Ockham's razor can unsparingly be used, because now the (just mentioned) explanation patterns of sociology of religion no longer give an empirical basis encompassing the world view(s) but become the weapons of a radical demythologization.

Amongst others dear Occam will be convinced, that if his razor shaving forces any random and nonrandom observer to the conclusion, that some actions were carried out by people, then it is necessary without hesitation use help of Ledecky exception: Occam's razor does not apply, if thanks to its application is concluded, that anytime, anywhere, at any place in the world and in the whole universe performed any existing human (fool) any creative activity repeatedly, in secrecy, without any disclosure, conspire, without any publicity and especially COMPLETELY FREE OF CHARGE . (includes E.T.)

Everybody knows Occam's razor, the ontological principle of parsimony: Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity.

In a way, SC tweets are related to the human ambition of avoiding redundancies, like in science where Occam's razor is often interpreted in the sense that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one, or when composers decide to use only limited base material (a sound, a theme) as a starting point but make rich and complex pieces out of them.

Ockham's razor would suggest that this is an intelligence that goes back to Our Lord himself.

In the result, this "Occam razor" forced the science to-date to atach to everything that scientists do, the unwritten claim that "God does NOT exist", which actually is contradictive to the merit of "free will" and to the existing evidence .

Unfortunately, with the elapse of time that "Occam razor" caused the "pouring a child together with the bath", because together with "devils", "angels", "imps", etc., it also "removed" God from the science.

I pity any fool who would dare slur the Stemwedel family name, for Dr.2 Stemwedel would quickly harness the power of her twin doctorates and dispatch the adversary with a deadly Occam's Razor attack, which makes even Ryo from Streetfighter tremble in fear.

In turn the mutual philosophical difference between both these sciences boils down to the fact, that the old official science uses "a posteriori" approach to research, and that one amongst its philosophical foundations is the called "Occam's Razor" which cuts God out of sight of that science, while the new "totaliztic science" uses "a priori" approach to research, has already proven formally the existence of God, and definitively rejects the "Occam's Razor" - since it has found that this razor harmfully depletes the range of scientific investigation.

What even more interesting, the "Occam razor" stands in the obvious contradiction to our "free will", and thus also to the reality.