Übersetzung für "Rule interpretation" in Deutsch

Article 3(1): change the third sentence into a rule of interpretation;

The VCLT recognizes a preamble as part of a treaty for the general rule of interpretation.

With the new rule interpretation, the importance of skill has become much more important.

The Schafkopf School has established itself as a kind of unofficial appeal authority for questions of rule interpretation.

The general rule governing the interpretation of treaties is contained in Article 31 of the Vienna Convention.

With these words the 1969 Vienna Convention[6] codifies the general rule of treaty interpretation.

In order to ensure the correct and uniform implementation of the provisional anti-dumping duties, a detailed rule for the interpretation of the principle of Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 for the determination of the origin of the products covered by those measures needs to be laid down with regard to crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels and one of their key components, crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells.

The election panel has therefore opted for a broad interpretation of Rule 3, an interpretation which in its view is more substantial and fits in better with the Committee's working methods and with the role that the three groups play within the Committee.

At first sight that does not appear to be the case in Germany but it is the task of the national court, which alone is competent to rule on the interpretation of German national law, to determine whether that is the case.

In the present case, the national court is asking the Court to rule on the interpretation of a provision of an agreement concluded between certain Member States.

The European Court of Justice will ultimately rule on the interpretation of these provisions by Member States.

But for the benefit of those who did not quite follow all that he said, what we are trying to do is to protect the right of the back bencher, rathet than merely the committee chairman or the rapporteur, to use this Rule, because the interpretation of the Rules Committee would appear to preclude anyone apart from the rapporteur or the chairman from utilising this Rule during a vote.

It must be recalled that under Article 234 EC, which is based on a clear separation of functions between national courts and tribunals and the Court of Justice, the latter is empowered to rule on the interpretation or validity of Community provisions only on the basis of the facts which the national court or tribunal puts before it, and that it is, however, for the national court or tribunal to apply the rules of Community law to a specific case.

Composite services consisting of a combination of different services which cannot be classified according to interpretation rule (l,a) shall be classified as if they consisted of the service which gives them their essential character, in so far as this criterion is applicable;

In Case 150/802 the Court was asked to rule on the interpretation of Articles 17 (agreements conferring jurisdiction), 18 (appearance for the purpose of contesting jurisdiction) and 22 (related actions).

The Court of Justice is therefore empowered to rule on the interpretation or validity of Community provisions only on the basis of the facts which the national court puts before it.

As to that, where there are actual or apparent differences in analysis between the administrative or judicial authorities of a Member State regarding the proper construction of national legislation, particularly in respect of its exact scope, it is not for the Court to rule on which interpretation is in accordance, or most in accordance, with Community law.

Thus the differences, at first sight fundamental, are finally reduced to the meaning of a rule of interpretation (27). No general assertion can be made however as to what tests are applied to the proof of an agreement which deviates from statute law.