Übersetzung für "Document forgery" in Deutsch

However, identity fraud and document forgery might increase.

I have absolutely no reason to believe that document is a forgery.

Von Neurath was the victim of a major forgery, Document 3859-PS.

Another big threat for business is raiders, who descend to both extortion and document forgery.

The same Indian entity is being investigated by authorities in Singapore for allegations of money laundering and document forgery.

Security elements serve to protect a security document and/or valuable document against forgery or copying.

It is not always easy – for the investigating authorities and still less so for PSPs – to classify illegal financial activities as belonging to a specific sector, particularly considering that terrorism has forged close links with organised crime and vice versa in a number of sectors: arms and drug trafficking, illegal immigration, counterfeiting of bank notes, document forgery and so forth.

Employers that have fulfilled the obligations set out in this Directive should not be held liable for having employed illegally staying third-country nationals, in particular if the competent authority later finds that the document presented by an employee had in fact been forged or misused, unless the employer knew that the document was a forgery.

Information exchange on visa-issuing practices and trends in document forgery already takes place both formally and informally.

To the extent that forger attempts to transfer the diffraction optically effective structure to a falsified value document, the forgery can be nevertheless detected because of the omission of the luminescent characteristic on the forged document in spite of the fact that it has been provided with the original diffraction effective structure.

The Court found him of money laundering, of violating the Narcotics Law and document forgery.

EU rules on free movement of citizens allow Member States to take effective and necessary measures to fight against abuse, such as marriages of convenience, and fraud, such as document forgery, or other artificial conducts or deceptions solely made to acquire the right to free movement, by refusing or terminating rights conferred by Directive 2004/38 (Article 35).

Bailer-Galanda begins by stating that Lachout had falsely claimed that the abandonment of preliminary proceedings conducted against him for document forgery had proved the authenticity of the document:

In other words, the Court does not speak of an "alleged 'document'" or a forgery, but accepts the document as genuine.

The second decisive issue was the question of whether or not a key document was a forgery: the letter of Auschwitz SS-Chief Architect Bischoff dated June 28, 1943 to the Wirtschafts- und Verwaltungshauptamt (WVHA) in Berlin in which he reported the completion of all four crematoria in Birkenau, the two large Lremas I and II each with 15 muffle kilns (combustion chambers for a corpse) as well as the two smaller ones, the only above-surface III and IV in Birkenau, each with 8 muffle kilns.

As Mr. Woltersdorf then explains in his article in the journal “Deutschland in Geschichte und Gegenwart” [“Germany in History and in the Present”], the argument advanced by Zionists of whatever persuasion purporting to prove the document a forgery can actually be turned around into its opposite – as a proof of its authenticity – if we trace the historic steps by which the Protocols came to be created.

What is generally overlooked in this connection, however, is the fact that while the lifted passages do constitute proof of plagiarism, it by no means follows that the entire document is a forgery.

The invention is based on the problem of proposing a security paper and a value document having increased forgery-proofness in comparison with the prior art.

The protection of the security document against forgery is hereby further increased, as an additional hard-to-forge layer with a color appearance dependent on the observation angle is applied without, however, a corresponding printing process being necessary.

In light of the prosecution mania that drives Austrian public prosecutors no less than German ones when it comes to combating Revisionists, the grounds for abandonment of the proceedings can only lie in a lack of evidence for document forgery.

So Lachout did not claim that the proceedings against him for document forgery had been abandoned on technical grounds.

The second decisive point of contention was the question whether the key document is a forgery: the writing of the SS building site manager Bischoff from 2 June 1943 to the WVHA in Berlin, in which he reports the completion of all four crematoria in Birkenau, of the {634} two big crematoria I and II with 15 muffles (chambers for incinerating a corpse) each as well as the two smaller crematoria III and IV (which are only above ground) in Birkenau with 8 muffles each.

In view of this, the original object which was supposed to prove the document a forgery could well now turn out to be an object confirming the authenticity of the controversial Protocols.