Übersetzung für "Vwgo" in Deutsch

Basing its judgement on procedural guideline 2013/32 / EU, the court ruled that "a period of six months can (still) be regarded an appropriate duration of the official procedure within the meaning of Section 75 sentence 1 VwGO”.

Which time limit for an examination and decision made by the Federal Office is appropriate according to § 75 S. 1 VwGO, depends on the individual circumstances of the case, in particular on its complexity and on the behavior by the parties.

The presentation of these parts of the file is relevant to the issue for a decision in the present proceedings, as that is the only way the Senate can pass a judgment on the claimant's claim - at least regarding the desire for a new decision of the defendant (see section 113 (5) second sentence VwGO).

In any case, the Senate requires knowledge of the requested parts of the file to decide on the request, also contained in the application, to pass a new judgment in the case of an absent ripeness for court decision to oblige the defendant to file a new decision on his application to get employed by the BND taking into consideration the legal opinion of the court (section 113 (5) second sentence VwGO).

Against this act, the concerning operator may lodge an objection within one month – within one year if there was no instruction concerning time and manner of objecting the decision – after announcement of the administrative act (Section 70 (1) of the Administrative Courts Order, VwGO).

To the extent that it is moreover of the opinion that a duty also exists for the motorist to look for the presence of no parking signs in stationary traffic without any reason to do so, this is inconsistent with federal law (section 137 (1) VwGO).

If the objection is rejected, the concerning operator – again, within a month or a year – may bring an action for avoidance before the responsible administrative court (Section 42 of the Administrative Courts Order, VwGO).

The time limit requirement of § 75 S. 2 VwGO concerning the earliest time for filing a complaint against failure to act is fulfilled, irrespective of whether the time limit began running with the informal request or with the formal application for asylum.

The admissibility requirements of § 75 S. 2 VwGO are met: Within the scope of the Asylum Procedures Directive, asylum seekers have the right to a decision made by the public authorities based on a personal hearing as well as the right to judicial review of the decision.