Übersetzung für "Primäre kosten" in Englisch

Whether primary cost could be established by deducting value of other buildings

If this causes a breakdown of the complete lighting, air-conditioning or heating control, this not only incurs primary costs for the equipment, it is also precisely the consequences of this system breakdown which make a difference.

In the event you decide to earn a reversal of mind yield, you have to pay for the return transportation and reimburse Newchic for the amount tag on shipping if you received complimentary delivery on your primary cost.

How to correctly determine the primary cost of the 29 buildings

The primary cost is self-evident.

The new AFPG tool essentially allows cost and time advantages.

Business does not require large primary cost!

The SolarWorld group is aiming to streamline its organizational structure under company law, primarily in order to save costs.

What are the primary costs in the sense of the Authority’s State aid Guidelines on aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities?

The municipality has submitted that the first assessment demonstrates that the primary cost for the municipality for acquiring the Inner Camp was NOK 12,4 million.

Deducted from the primary cost of 12,4 million these assessments show, according to the municipality, that the primary cost for the 29 buildings in question was not more than NOK 4 million.

It disputes both the starting point regarding the primary cost of the Inner Camp as well as the method of deducting assumed value of other buildings in order to determine the “rest” primary cost.

As mentioned above, the assessment of the primary cost of the 29 buildings at issue is complicated by the fact that it was not made clear in the agreement between the state and the municipality what the latter paid for the different buildings in the Inner Camp.

The calculation was not based on a value assessment of the buildings as such but the calculation applied instead the primary cost of the Inner Camp at NOK 12,4 million as a starting point, before deducting the estimated value of the buildings in the Inner Camp that were not sold to Haslemoen AS.

The municipality referred moreover to the opening decision in which the Authority explained that to the extent a preceding sales process has determined the market value, a public authority may use its primary cost as an indication of the market value unless a significant period of time has elapsed since the acquisition.

In order to establish the primary cost for the municipality for the 29 buildings in question, the municipality considers that it was correct to deduct the value of the other properties within the Inner Camp which were not subject to the sales agreement.

The next question is therefore whether the municipality in its subsequent sale of parts of the Inner Camp to Haslemoen AS sold at a price at least corresponding to its primary cost.

The assessment of whether the sales price for the 29 buildings corresponded to the primary cost appears complicated since it was never made explicitly clear in the agreement between the state and the municipality what the latter paid for the different buildings in the Inner Camp.

Finally, primary costs as stipulated in Section 2.2 d) of the Guidelines are not relevant in this case [89] and cannot be used to establish minimum benchmark.

As mentioned above, the notion that a resale for at least primary cost may exclude state aid rests on the condition that the land or buildings were acquired at market value in the first place.

The next question is whether the primary cost of the 29 buildings in question can be determined by deducting from the Inner Camp the value of the buildings that were not sold to Haslemoen AS.

The described method basically entailed that no detailed assessment was made of the 29 buildings in question because there were indications that other parts of the Inner Camp were of a sufficiently high value to ensure that the overall value corresponded to the municipality’s alleged primary cost for the Inner Camp.

In short, the bridge value report was used to establish the starting point, the NOK 12,4 million primary cost value of the Inner Camp as such.

Thus, the Authority concludes that the method referred to in the assessment of 2 May 2006 was not suitable to determine the primary cost and thereby the market value of the 29 buildings in question.

Since this assessment was the basis for the bridge value which again formed the basis for the actual price paid by the municipality, the Authority considers that the first Agdestein report provides the individual values necessary to accurately establish the primary cost of the 29 buildings in question.

Applying the bridge value method, the primary cost for the municipality for the 29 buildings in question was NOK 8863712.

Given that the Authority has accepted that the state sold Haslemoen Leir to Våler municipality at market value, it accepts that a sum of NOK 8863712 was the municipality’s primary cost for the buildings and that this was the necessary indication of the market value.

A resale at primary cost must be assumed to cover the same price reducing elements.

However, as described above, it is not clear to the Authority whether the municipality, before selling to Haslemoen AS, actually made any such calculations in order to determine its primary cost for the 29 buildings in question.

Rather than competing primarily on cost, added value manufacturers deliver value by delivering product/service innovation, establishing process excellence, achieving high brand recognition and/or contributing to a sustainable society.

Foodstuffs therefore must be viewed in a completely different light from, say, industrial goods, where costs largely determine where those goods are produced.

Those CCs where the primary costs take the largest share of the value of crop output are Estonia (39%), Bulgaria (36%) and the Slovak republic (37%).