Translation of "Triebbefriedigung" in English

This is the next vast difference between real and imitative satisfaction of the instinct.

The particular importance of the game in the double perspective of instinct satisfaction and knowledge signals a change of function.

The game mobilizes the energies of the personalities and impulses, while the instinct satisfaction remains only limited.

This means that the world is descending into a swamp of sexual perversion and the unrestricted satisfaction of sexual instinct.

Also in the domain of the instinct satisfaction, the holistic imitation character of the game produces quite similar consequences.

The optimal juxtaposition and imbrication of knowledge and instinct satisfaction are "imitated" immediately from two sides in the so interpreted game.

Knowledge and instinct satisfaction as phenomena, but also as concepts, constitute a mysterious and full relationship to each other.

This representation depends positively together on the fact, that in Broch the "knowledge" (with its very large concept specifically only characteristic for Broch) is a necessary condition of the adequate and emancipatory satisfaction of the instinct .

Broch would however not be Broch, if he would not also immediately describe the function of imitation of the game, and through this description would also not immediately inform of the dangers, that occur through this imitation of (real) knowledge and (real) instinct satisfaction.

For, it is only one side, that Broch, in his elaboration of the new semantics of both concepts in detail (knowledge + instinct satisfaction), comes to an instrument, that is capable, like none before, to describe a world situation.

As criterion and double condition of the optimal human life, this simultaneity and optimal imbrication of knowledge and instinct satisfaction, it can therefore alone realize, that man penetrates "toward above" the "twilight state" (Daemmerzustand) surrounding him.

Knowledge (Erkenntnis) and instinct satisfaction as phenomena, but also as concepts, constitute a mysterious and full relationship to each other .

Every human action must, in every act, correspond simultaneously to two criteria, it must represent the "knowledge" and extend, as well as it must also realize an optimal practice of the "instinct satisfaction".

As a summary, we should emphasize, that Hermann Broch's mass psychology, because of its courage to put the twilight state (Daemmerzustand) at the center of the investigation, not less but because of its methodological innovation to raise the always correlated double aspects of knowledge and instinct satisfaction to the dimension of the conceptual interpretation, could analyze relevant sides of the effective mass psychological processes of the past, but also of the present.

Human infants first seek their gratification in a direct, unhampered, and undiscriminating way, until they learn to modify and control their instinctual urges through social conditioning.

Quite generally, a whole is "played", while something such as an instinct satisfaction is happening.

Thus, the majority of the local instinct satisfaction in the domain of the individual psychology is transferred, in a new way, to the masses.

Yet she is deeply sympathetic to the Islamist rejection of secular humanism, which she thinks has created “a debauched and disorderly culture of instant gratification, with disintegrating families, feral children and violence, squalor and vulgarity on the streets.”

Broch evokes, that while the constructive positivity of the instinct satisfaction is not realized in the game, it becomes however - in the reality!

On the side of the instinct satisfaction, the so interpreted game is capable to imitate emotionally the most different sections of the society.

As far as the instinct satisfaction is concerned, we can then recognize in it, without any difficulty, a version of the psychoanalysis used in a formed intellectual discourse.

Does sex hold such a place in our lives that we think of nothing but our gratification?

This unity (knowledge and instinct satisfaction) is at the same time an axiom, without it the human soul cannot be happy in the social space, and it goes also without saying, that the non-accession to this state does not mean an indifferent life, rather a danger and a situation of mercy.

Since the leader of the large group does not satisfy the needs for protection and care, pseudo-alternative leaders can be used to seduce the group away from an arduous but realistic solution to their difficulties and towards a regression to a primitive form of urge satisfaction.