Translation of "Gefährdungsstufe" in English

This combination of the failure-to-yield criterion and the collision risk criterion is categorized in risk level A.

Also, the type and number of reactions to a risk level can be reduced.

Compliant with the requirements in European fire protection standards (EN 45545, Hazard Level 2)

Geographical scope of the application and risk rating of the regions covered by the project

Finally, at risk level G, measures are taken that have a powerful influence on the vehicle motion itself.

At risk level F, with the activation of the function module 28, reversible restraint systems, such as belt tighteners, are tripped.

The report shall determine the level of threat for each section of the external border by multiplying the length of the border section concerned with the weighing attributed to it as follows:

On its Red List, the Swedish Samarbetsgruppen Lantrasforum (Cooperative Group Landrace Forum) ranks all five of these Allmogeko breeds in the highest risk level, "acutely threatened".

They feature EMC according to ENÂ 50121-1 and ENÂ 501-3-2 and fire protection up to hazard level HL3 according to ENÂ 45545-2 (2016).

The selection of the colors green, yellow and red as a function of the level of endangerment is meaningful, since a road user associates these colors with the corresponding information.

With the aid of predeterminable control equipment, a risk level for the vehicle 2 itself is ascertained in the function module 26 from the collision risk criterion and the failure-to-yield criterion.

As a reaction to the ascertainment of the risk level A, in this exemplary embodiment of the invention, a warning of an impending collision is given to the driver.

For instance at risk level B, a braking event can be prepared for by applying the brake jaws (prefilling) and/or by modifying threshold values of a braking assistant.

At risk level C, tripping threshold values of restraint systems, such as the air bag and belt tighteners, are modified, in the direction of greater sensitivity, by the function module 28 .

At risk level D, an intervention is made into the engine controller by the function module 27, in order to reduce the driving moment of the engine.

At risk level E, via the function module 30, an intervention is made into the brake controller, and first a warning braking event is tripped, in order to focus the reaction readiness of the driver on a braking event.

With the aid of predeterminable control equipment, a risk level for the vehicle 2 itself is ascertained in the function module 26 from the collision risk criterion and the attentiveness criterion.

For instance, if the collision risk criterion K is greater than a first value 1, and the attentiveness criterion is greater than a value 2, then a risk level A has been reached.

As a reaction to the ascertainment of the risk level A, in this second exemplary embodiment of the invention, a warning to the driver of an impending collision with the vehicle 3 approaching in oncoming traffic is contemplated.

Depending on the risk level derived, it is then advantageously possible to take countermeasures to avoid an impending collision.

The function modules 24 and 25 are in turn connected to a function module 26, which serves to ascertain a risk level.

Due to the continuous, and indeed, in particular, the constantly changeable, stepless, i.e., analog output of the vehicle-surroundings information and the risk level corresponding to it, the driver is constantly kept informed about the surroundings of the vehicle; he does not, as is the case in the conventional method, have to react suddenly because a warning signal is output surprisingly and unexpectedly in the event a specific risk level is exceeded.