Translation of "Einkommensanteil" in English

Value as Number Income share held by lowest 10%

You never get less than your revenue share.

During that same period, the share of the national income of the top 10% increased from 32 to 40 percent.

In most of these areas the share of income from low-productivity agricultural sectors was large, and unemployment was high.

The below chart shows the correlation between the income share of the rich and the savings rate is strongly negative.

The revenue share is calculated on the net income (after removing the paypal fee).

The World Bank says that just a 1 % rise in the proportion of the labour force which receives secondary education increases the share of income received by the poorest half of the population by between 6 and 15 %.

Food prices have shot up 83% since 2005, which, when linked with the high percentage of income that the poorest spend on food, means that we are now faced with the most important factor in increasing poverty and inequality.

But the long-term trends identified – a rise in capital owners’ share of income and the concentration of “primary income” (before taxes and transfers) at the very top of the distribution in the United States and other major economies – remain unchallenged.

Given that capital ownership remains concentrated among those with high incomes, the share of income going to the very top of the distribution also will rise.

Indeed, corporations’ growing share of income has been a major driver behind the long, if uneven, bull market in stocks that began in the early 1990’s.

Contrary to popular belief, recent research finds that technology is not the primary driver of labor’s declining share of income.

In the Nordic countries, by contrast, the poorest 20% of households receive nearly 10% of total income, putting them at roughly one-half of the national average.

Income inequality remained particularly high in Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, Lithuania, Latvia, Portugal and Romania in 2013, with the income share of the top 20% being at least six times higher than that of the bottom 20%.

The share of income spent on food increased, and accounted for over half of household purchases.

Wide disparities in income share between these groups, can reflect poor levels of social cohesion, and the heightened risk of social exclusion for those at the lower end of the income distribution.

In 1990 the share of total income that agricultural household derived from independent activity had fallen to little more than half (55%), contrasting with increases seen particularly in the proportion from wages and from social benefits.

The share-out takes the form of employees being given, over and above a fixed level of pay, a variable share of their income which is directly linked to profits or to any other criterion reflecting the firm's performance (e.g. value added, operating revenue, etc.).

The share of income spent on food increased throughout the period, accounting for over half of household purchases in September.

The share of income of the first decile was lowest in the Southern Member States (2%), and highest in Denmark, Austria and Luxembourg (4%).

The increase in the hourly wage rate (10.7% for firms, including the large nationalized enterprises) was offset by an approximately 2% reduction in working hours in these firms.

If the typical American family still retained the same share of income that they did in 1970, they'd earn like 45,000 dollars more a year.

Saving, in economics, is the share of income of people, businesses or institutions that is not spent in the period in which income is received, but is set aside to be spent at a future time.

The income share of the top 1 percent of US income earners rose from 10 percent in 1980 to 20 percent in 2016, while the income share of the bottom 50 percent fell from 20 percent to 13 percent over the same period.