Translation of "Antragsberechtigung" in English

Justification for the application may be provided by persons other than the proprietor of the trademark.

This is known as a "subject access request".

The general eligibility requirements for the funding programme in question apply.

If you are unsure whether you may apply, please contact the Committee on Research (AFF) .

For grant eligibility on the German side, the usual DFG rules apply.

Please consult the Eccellenza Regulations to determine your formal eligibility.

The restriction of the entitlement to file is supported by objective considerations.

The researcher is therefore also prohibited from submitting proposals for two years.

However, § 126a GO–BT does not change the quorum for filing an application to initiate an abstract judicial review.

Some elements of those amendments have been taken on board by the common position’s Article 11 which deals with “criteria for entitlement at Community level”.

With a one-year exclusion from proposal eligibility and two written reprimands, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) has once again drawn consequences from the scientific misconduct of grant applicants and recipients.

At its session at the DFG's Annual Meeting 2014 in Frankfurt am Main, the Joint Committee of Germany's largest research funding organisation and the central self-governing organisation of the German research community announced that it will issue a written reprimand to medical scientist Dr. Dennis Rottländer and ban him from submitting proposals for a period of four years.

At its recommendation, the Joint Committee decided to revoke Heils’ right to submit proposals to the DFG for three years.

At its session in Bonn, the Joint Committee of Germany's largest research funding organisation and the central self-governing organisation of the German research community announced that it will issue a written reprimand to a life sciences researcher and bar her from submitting proposals for a period of three years.

Wenz, who previously worked at the University of Cologne and has since left the research community, has received a written reprimand and a ban on submitting proposals for a period of five years.

In view of the deliberate data manipulation that took place, the committee proposed that, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure, a written reprimand be issued and Rottländer be banned from submitting proposals for four years.

They submit that a restriction of the entitlement to file to the Land government alone, under the wording of § 68 BVerfGG, is not convincing.

The ordinary courts have found the applications filed in the valuation proceedings by the second applicant and the third applicant in the original proceedings to be admissible and, as can be seen from the main reasons for their decisions, affirmed the right to file an application of these applicants and of the joint proxy pursuant to § 6 SpruchG.

We expect to dispatch the Offer Document and Entitlement and Acceptance Form to Eligible Shareholders on or around 20 April 2012.

Depending on the type and severity of the misconduct ascertained, the Joint Committee can decide to prevent the perpetrator from submitting proposals to the DFG for several years, to rescind a funding decision, or to exclude the perpetrator from participation in DFG statutory bodies.

In two of the four cases, the researchers have also been prohibited from submitting proposals to the DFG for periods of three and five years.

With a one-year exclusion from proposal eligibility and two written reprimands, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) has once again drawn consequences from the scientific misconduct of grant applicants and recipients.

In view of the deliberate data manipulation that took place, the committee proposed that, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure, a written reprimand be issued and Rottländer be banned from submitting proposals for four years.