Übersetzung für "Unternehmenssteuer" in Englisch

In contrast, corporate tax is based on the realised annual profit.

A minimum level for corporate tax rates should follow as a second step.

Since 2012, Lucerne has Switzerland’s lowest corporate tax rate at cantonal level.

These companies are exempt from corporate income tax and the land inquisition levy.

Should the U.S. raise or lower the tax rate for corporations?

Corporation tax is being reviewed, more firms will enjoy a lower tax rate.

The corporation thus circumvented the Ghanaian business tax of 25 per cent.

Furthermore, in 2008 the corporate tax reform came into power, clearly reducing firms’ tax burden.

Health insurance premiums are rising again, the pensions system is still a work in progress, and corporate tax reform remains blocked.

We see that it may, in some areas, be a useful tool, but we clearly wish it to be known that we want a minimum level of taxation in the EU, for example, for corporation tax.

We do not need to be pressurised regarding our corporation tax and we particularly do not need lectures from people like Mr Sarkozy, who seems very cosy with an effective rate of 8.2% in France, while our effective rate is actually 11.9%.

I think it is entirely putting the cart before the horse for any Member of this Parliament to talk here about establishing a minimum corporation profits tax across the European Union without also talking about a common fiscal policy, without also having a budget strong enough to provide the cohesion necessary for weak and peripheral states, and a whole range of other European policies that need to be put in place before we can seriously talk about a corporation tax being the same right across the European Union.

Federalism will roll on implacably. Just as in the United States of America, Brazil, India and Australia, we will have to share income tax and corporation tax receipts between the nation-states and Europe.

Yet the only certainty about the proposals to harmonise the base for company tax is that they create uncertainty.

By the stealth of this proposal, it is clear that Brussels aspires to replace the nation state as the deciding authority on company taxation.

I cannot, therefore, support the view that a common consolidated corporate tax regime will not hamper EU competitiveness and that is, unfortunately, one of the reasons why, as the rapporteur on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, I had my name removed from this report.

Paragraph 32 refers to harmonisation in the area of taxation, amongst others, and also urges the Commission to push ahead with its proposals concerning a common consolidated corporate tax base.

In any case, simple majority means we could end up with a European budget of double the size and the imposition of a European business tax, or even a European income tax.

National control of corporation tax has been a key weapon in the arsenal of many countries in fighting for international investment.

Thirdly, the European Commission’s proposal for corporate tax harmonisation is based on the assumption that harmful tax competition results in a shift in taxation away from taxes on mobile capital and towards taxes on comparatively immobile labour and that this development is harmful for employment and ordinary EU citizens.

For example, corporation tax in my area of Northern Ireland should be radically reduced as a means of stimulating investment, thereby moving us away from over-dependence on the public sector.

The recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in favour of the Marks [amp] Spencer company, which had asked the UK authorities for tax relief to offset losses suffered by subsidiaries of the group in other European countries, creates a new set of conditions and will have a significant impact on government revenue from corporation tax.

Having to compete with a 12.5% corporation tax south of the border in Ireland, the capacity for Northern Ireland to give aid to attract foreign investment is absolutely indispensable.