Übersetzung für "Schutzbegehren" in Englisch

The applicant reserves the right to seek its own patent protection for this.

The general public had therefore been warned that protection was sought in any or all of these countries.

In assessing claims made in relation to the privilege against self-incrimination, the hearing officer may consider whether undertakings make clearly unfounded claims for protection merely as a delaying tactic.

Without proper registration, including the use of biometrics, and/or documentation of the fact that an asylum-seeker sought protection, any collective system for apportioning subsequent State responsibilities may be seriously undermined.

As a precaution, all the spring systems for the prepressing roller lie within the wishes of protection of the invention, which exhibit a progressively rising spring characteristic and differ in detail from the previously described solution.

In the context of explaining why, for the purpose of delimiting the claimed-subject matter with respect to a conflicting application, a disclaimer is not in contradiction to Article 123(2) EPC, the Enlarged Board speaks very generally of "an invention comprising "different specific embodiments or groups thereof" having been disclosed in the application as filed, a "part of which" is excluded from the requested protection.

This reflects the general principle in law whereby the protection sought must match the technical contribution made by the disclosed invention to the state of the art.

The effect of the requested amendments is that the claims of the application after amendment seek protection for a fibre optic amplifier (and a method of pumping an optical fibre) including one or more light sources, whereas in the application as filed the claims sought protection for a fibre optic amplifier (and a method of pumping an optical fibre) including two or more light sources ("a plurality of pump light sources").

Her request for protection was nevertheless ignored and she was removed back to Ukraine.

Generally in the abstract or in combination with other already existing claims, the claims are also directed at a subject that has the features of at least one or more of the following paragraphs:

The applicant expressly reserves the right to make a separate application for protection for the previously described aspect with regard to an eye-suction device with a container element, wherein the eye-suction device and the container element may also be integrally formed or may be coupled with one another not only by means of partial vacuum but also mechanically, for example positively or frictionally.

The individual features of the claims in the present main and auxiliary requests can be derived from the original application documents as well as the patent specification and, in combination, represent a desired protection which is restricted in relation to the claims as granted.

As a consequence, it appears that the purpose of the example given in point 2.1.3 of the Reasons of an invention comprising different specific embodiments or groups thereof disclosed in the application as filed, a part of which is excluded from the requested protection, must be understood as giving a typical example in which the disclaimer does not normally change the teaching of the subject-matter remaining in the claim and does not normally add information.

In a letter dated 10 December 1982 the protection applied for was restricted to products for preventing the detrimental effects of oxazyphosphorin metabolites, which contain 2-mercapto-ethane-sulphonic acid either as sole active ingredient (claims 1 and 2) or together with an oxazaphosphorin cytostatic agent (claims 3 to 6).

These demands reaffirm the corresponding demands of recommendation R (81)16 of the ministerial committee of the Council of Europe and fundamentally accord with Requirement 8 of the Memorandum for the Protection of Refugees, according to which every asylum seeker has a legal claim to having his/her application examined "impartially" and "sympathetically".

The board stated that such subject-matter could subsequently be excluded from the protection sought by a wide claim by means of a disclaimer, if the subject-matter remaining in the claim could not be defined more clearly and concisely directly, i.e.

This is quite independent of the question of whether asylum is granted or not. Hence Article 2 of the Commission proposal should contain a reference to other international obligations, particularly Article 3 of the European Human Rights Convention and Article 3 of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, independently of an application for asylum protection.

A technical feature which was an essential feature for the purpose of determining the scope of protection conferred (i.e. which limited the claimed protection) was not necessarily an essential feature for the purpose of determining priority.