Übersetzung für "Leistungsverweigerung" in Englisch

The same applies for the assertion of rights regarding performance refusal and withholding rights.

In the present case, Clearstream’s behaviour qualified as refusal to supply because:

In the present case, Clearstream’s behaviour qualified as refusal to supply because:

In the present case, Clearstream’s behaviour qualified as refusal to supply because:

However, this potential should not be hindered by anti-competitive practices such as unfair denial of access or excessive and/or discriminatory prices.

The paper suggests a framework for the continued rigorous enforcement of Article 82 EC, building on the economic analysis carried out in recent cases, and setting out one possible methodology for the assessment of some of the most common abusive practices, such as predatory pricing, single branding, tying, and refusal to supply.

In Germany a new law in force since 1 January 2009 improves the position of the creditor for ‘business to consumer’ contracts (e.g. advance payments, refusal of service if no guarantee, collateral to be provided).

Limitations and exclusions of liability shall not apply if such involve a counterclaim arising from a non-cash claim entitled to refuse performance or if rights are asserted regarding a claim for damages.

This does not apply, when based on the circumstances the delay in performance, in particular when due to relatively slight default of the outstanding amount, would be disproportionate.

The statutory provisions concern- ing the exclusion of the obligation of performance as well as any of our statutory rights to refuse performance remain unaffected.

A contractual penalty regulated under employment law does not cover a refusal to work which is contrary to the employment agreement if the agreement is "terminated" by the employee without observing the notice period as the Federal Labor Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht – BAG) has now ruled (BAG judgement dated 23 January 2014; Case No.: 8 AZR 130/13).

That is why this book not only focusses on the latest legal standards, but also provides new solutions and perspectives, particularly with regard to the topics of ‘the legally binding force of change-order agreements’, ‘the option of refusing service in case of disputes about the basis and amount of compensation’, and proving claims of construction-time delays.

If it becomes evident after the conclusion of the contract that SEMIKRON's entitlement to the purchasing price is jeopardized by the contracting party's insufficient capacity (for example commencement of bankruptcy proceedings), SEMIKRON shall be entitled to refuse performance and - possibly after fixing a time limit - to rescind the contract (section 321 of the German Civil Code [BGB]).

If it becomes evident after the conclusion of the contract that SEMIKRON's entitlement to the purchasing price is jeopardized by the buyer's insufficient capacity (for example commencement of bankruptcy proceedings), SEMIKRON shall be entitled to refuse performance and - possibly after fixing a time limit - to rescind the contract (section 321 of the German Civil Code [BGB]).

The part I have the biggest problem with is they then effectively BECOME A SPAMMER by sending thousands of messages in a Distributed Denial of Service attack (DDoS).

Concerning any additional payment obligations arising from booking changes, we would specifically refer to our right to refuse services (Article 4.5.1).

While there is hardly any knowledge about early whistleblowers in the private sector there are at least a few cases in the public service in German history that can be categorised as whistleblowing or closely related as performance refusal for ethical reasons:

The customer is not authorised to service rejection based on warranty claims, unless the customer's complaint was recognised by BRINCK in writing.

If there are indications after conclusion of the contract that our entitlement to the purchase price is at risk through the inability of the Buyer to pay, then we are entitled, in accordance with statutory regulations, to refuse service and – if necessary after setting a deadline – to cancel the contract (§ 321 BGB (civil code)).

In their appeal, the applicants contested the denition of the product market and hence the dominant position held by CBF. e applicants claimed also that their conduct was not abusive with regard to the refusal to supply as the diculties resulting in the delay of linking EB to CBF’s settlement processing system were attributable to EB.

If the Purchaser’s asset situation deteriorates in a way that could jeopardise the settlement of our unpaid accounts receivable from the respective contractual relation (e.g. on account of an application filed for insolvency proceedings), we are entitled, in accordance with the statutory provisions, to refuse performance and to rescind the contract after fixing a grace period as required. In the case of contracts on the manufacture of individual objects (single-unit production), we are entitled to rescind immediately.

The non-payment of due invoices or other circumstances indicating a significant deterioration of the purchaser's financial situation (e.g. application to commence insolvency proceedings) entitle us to demand immediate payment of all our claims from the ongoing business relationship with the purchaser. According to the statutory regulations pertaining to refusal of performance and after stipulating a deadline -if required -we are furthermore entitled to withdrawal from the agreement (§ 321 BGB (German Civil Code).

In respect of the extra costs payable by passengers in the case of rebooking, we make explicit reference to our right to deny the provision of services (Article 4.5.1).