Übersetzung für "Grundsatzbeschluss" in Englisch

The Court of Justice differentiates between the policy decision of 6 September 2012 on the one hand and the implementation of the programme on the other.

The decision in favour of a new federal/state initiative to succeed the Excellence Initiative is also very welcome.

Today's fundamental decision by Parliament defines the parameters to be used by the European Commission as a template when drafting the legislative package.

The decision of principle taken last September in New York to establish a Human Rights Council in place of the Commission on Human Rights was one decision that justified a positive assessment of the Summit.

Of course, last September’s decision was only a decision of principle, and it took difficult negotiations to breathe life into this Human Rights Council.

The Israeli security cabinet has also decided, in principle, to remove President Arafat from the Occupied Territories.

Arrangements for the planned civil society prize are being formulated further to a decision in principle taken at the presidents' meeting in September.

If an item of expenditure requires a decision of principle by the institution, the draft of that decision cannot be adopted by the institution unless it has first received the agreement of the financial controller.

Following today's decision in principle, the Budgetary Authority must now formally adopt the Amending Budget by early December.

The decision in principle concerning the anti-subsidy investigation still stands, although it will not be activated for the time being to allow the continuation of the negotiations with the Chinese authorities towards an amicable solution addressing the EU concerns with respect to subsidization.

The landmark decision taken today by the EIB Board of Governors will allow for the pre-financing of SME projects linked to the Investment Plan for Europe before the summer.

On 24 February 1898, the government adopted the principle that all the main routes in the country should be established as national railways.

The Management Committee has reached a decision in principle in this respect, and this should be implemented in the course of 1976.

Following a 2008 policy decision, the pre-planning cost of €1.24 million was financed by the Interessenverband Südbahn (Southern Railway Association), bringing together 24 cities and towns along the line.

With a view to the proportionality of the OMT programme and the fulfilment of the obligations to state reasons, it specifies additional compelling restrictions that apply to any implementation of the OMT programme and exceed the framework conditions indicated in the policy decision.

With the consent of the Supervisory Board, the Board of Management of AGRANA Beteiligungs-Aktiengesellschaft has decided in principle to carry out a capital increase by utilizing the authorized capital as approved by the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on 5 November 2004.

However, according to the Court of Justice, only government bonds of such Member States that have bond market access may be purchased (cf. ECJ, Gauweiler, loc. cit., para. 86). In so holding, the Court of Justice goes beyond the framework conditions formulated in the policy decision regarding the OMT Programme, which envisaged such a requirement only in certain cases.

If interpreted in accordance with the Court of Justice’s judgment, the policy decision on the OMT programme does not “manifestly” exceed the competences attributed to the European Central Bank.

For this purpose, S & T AG, Linz (Austria), has today taken a decision in principle on a non-cash capital increase, excluding subscription rights of the existing shareholders.

Thus, for example, in the Karlsruhe UTC postgraduate students will be directly integrated into jointly and in some cases publicly funded research projects with Rolls-Royce – in line with the strengthening of the “knowledge triangle” of training, research and innovation which the research ministers of the EU member states emphasised in their framework resolution of June 2007.

Together with the planning authorities, the Munich City Council is working on a framework resolution, and an international urban development competition is also being prepared.

In conclusion, Dr Salomon announced a decision in principle will be made next year at the latest regarding the second construction phase.

Unlike the Senate, the Court of Justice examines not only on the policy decision of 6 September 2012 concerning technical details, but derives further framework conditions – in particular from the principle of proportionality –, which set binding limits to any implementation of the OMT Programme.

The Court of Justice does not address the consideration that limiting the OMT Programme to monetary policy goals aiming at restoring the transmission mechanism could be hindered by the fact that according to the policy decision purchases of government bonds are generally not permissible – irrespective of the effects on the transmission mechanism – if the state in question does not have access to the bonds market or if it does not abide by the rules of current macroeconomic adjustment programmes; it also does not address the fact that the quantifiability of the share of the interest rates that is not dependent on macroeconomics has been disputed – e.g. by the Bundesbank – although quantifiability would be a precondition for the determination of the volume that could by justified under monetary policy considerations if the programme were implemented.