Übersetzung für "Grundrechtseingriff" in Englisch

This violation of human rights is surely the real scandal of Echelon.

From the perspective of the child affected, inducing the loss of its citizenship is a serious interference with its fundamental rights.

Such a secret measure as this represented a particularly grievous infringement of constitutional rights.

According to this judgment, any cognisance, recording and utilisation of com-munications data by the state constitutes an encroachment on basic rights.

Neither of these points is mentioned in the report, which essentially focuses on the monitoring that is undertaken by national intelligence agencies in violation of fundamental rights.

We must limit the use of stored and transmitted information to the defined scope of application in order to prevent general storage of information on citizens and to minimise the infringement of fundamental rights on the basis of this regulation.

Viewed from the perspective of criminal law, the judgment raises the question of whether, in the case of a criminal provision, as in the case of any other encroachment upon a fundamental right, the issue of proportionality – namely, the legitimacy of the goal of the intervention, its necessity, and its proportionality (in a narrow sense) – is the only issue to be considered.

Such an approach corresponds to the character of warding off danger as the protection of legal interests and guarantees a direct connection to the main objective which is intended to justify the encroachment upon fundamental rights.

The use of physical restraints, which, by its nature, will often already be terminated before a judicial review can take place, amounts to such a serious interference with fundamental rights.

The remaining ex post-review cannot undo interferences with fundamental rights that have already taken place and does not fulfil the requirement of providing preventive judicial protection of fundamental rights.

The decisive factor is whether, in an overall assessment based on the purpose of the surveillance measure and the intended data use, the interest of the authorities in specific data records has already taken such concrete shape that the persons concerned must be regarded as being directly affected in such a way that it qualifies as an interference with fundamental rights.

As stated, the standard is that there can only be an interference with fundamental rights where the authorities have a specific interest in the data records concerned (cf. para. 43 above).

However, the judges felt that the storage of user data without occasion represented a particularly grievous infringement of constitutional rights and exceeded the boundaries of reasonableness.

With regard to the decision that automatic number plate recognition constitutes an interference with fundamental rights even in cases of a no match (see paras.

Under the case-law of the Federal Constitutional Court, in the case of investigation measures which create a serious encroachment upon fundamental rights preemptive supervision by an independent instance may be constitutionally required.

The constitutional complaint is based on the assumption that in this form, too, the privatisation is unconstitutional and the acting hospital staff therefore did not have the right to carry out the measure affecting the complainant’s fundamental right.

This does not constitute an encroachment upon fundamental rights at the expense of the insurers, because the purpose of the statute is not to regulate the practice of an occupation, but solely to strengthen statutory health insurance.

However, this does not eliminate the interference with fundamental rights: The complainant’s gender identity is not only impaired by their incorrect assignment to the female gender, but also by the currently stipulated choice of the legal alternative “missing data” (§ 22(3) PStG).