Übersetzung für "Besitzstandswahrung" in Englisch

They reject all attempts to protect vested rights and the exceptions to them.

This analysis will also show you the prevailing preservation of vested rights.

But this, too, will destroy the preservation of property and is very “politically incorrect“.

Possession of property is therefore a huge topic.

The protection of vested rights feels like a new human right in Germany.

Possession of property is a huge topic.

The needs-based justice of the poor has in any case precedence over maintaining the living standards of the rich.

The enormous transformation processes created under difficult conditions by our neighbours in central and eastern Europe since the historic turning point of 1989 should not be answered by a simple call for protection of rights of possession on our part.

Where is the courage to tell the public that we have to stop protecting vested interests if we are to reshape a successful Union?

Stability and the successful development of an enlarged Union will be guaranteed after 2006 only if common objective criteria rather than the protection of possession constitute the precondition for the allocation of funds.

The Financial Times yesterday reported on the labour market problems in Germany, describing how reform is being resisted and vested interests are being protected, all under the guise of promoting social justice.

I only have criticism for the attempts being made by many Members here to protect their vested rights and secure their own stipends, when surely the actual aim has to be economic and social cohesion.

First, thanks to an effective – albeit porous – capital-control regime in China, short-term “hot money” (capital coming into China aimed at arbitrage, rent-seeking, and speculation) could not enter (and then leave) freely and swiftly.

Neither the old statist left, nor the rent-seeking, crony-capitalist right had policies to respond to the yearning for inclusion.

As currently drafted, it is unclear whether these will be required to adjust themselves within a six-month period during which time they will be protected by the block exemption, or whether they will be permitted to "grandfather" their existing conditions until expiry of the relevant consortia agreements.

When implementing the directive (procedures, implementation timetable), the principles of maintaining acquired rights and providing planning and legal certainty on the one hand and ensuring maximum safety on the other must be respected on a balanced basis.

The grandfathering applies to all negotiable debt securities which are first issued before 1 March 2001 or for which the original issuing prospectuses were certified before that date.

The grandfathering of the aforementioned securities is conditioned on whether any further issues of such securities are made on or after 1 March 2002.

Negotiable debt securities which are issued on or after 1 March 2001 are therefore not grandfathered, unless the original prospectus was certified before that date.

In this context, it needs to be noted that rules relating to closure, new entrants, capacity extensions/reductions (which already exist) and periodic updating of reference years, encourage production maximisation in comparison with a situation of grandfathering of free allowances.

Increasing the series length would reduce fragmentation of the slot structure at an airport, since short series attracting grandfather rights can prevent longer series being operated by other airlines.

However, Gewährträgerhaftung can be maintained (grandfathered) even after 18 July 2005 to protect creditors in the following cases:

A balance must be struck between the principles of maintaining acquired rights and providing planning and legal certainty on the one hand and ensuring maximum safety on the other.